Financial Comparison
Your Company vs. Furniture Industry Peers (Similar Size)
Key Financial Metrics: FY2025
Metric |
Your Company |
Industry Median* |
Revenue (Annual, est.) |
$33.6M (extrapolated) |
$28M |
Gross Profit Margin |
~34% |
32% |
Net Income Margin |
-5% |
4% |
Current Ratio |
4.7 |
1.8 |
Quick Ratio |
2.9 |
1.0 |
Accounts Receivable Days |
61 days |
49 days |
Inventory Turnover |
3.2x |
5.1x |
Debt-to-Equity |
0.27 |
0.56 |
Sources: Industry medians are based on companies with $20M–$50M annual revenue in the global furniture/manufacturing sector (2022–2024 data).
* Benchmarks compiled from IBISWorld, Sageworks, CSI Market, and comparable public/private company reports.
Key: Your Company (as of Jul 2025 consolidated financials)
Note: Some metrics are annualized or extrapolated from latest available monthly figures for comparability.
Summary & Insights
-
Revenue & Scale: Your top-line revenue outpaces the median peer in your industry size bracket. This indicates solid market penetration or pricing strength.
-
Profitability: Your gross margin is slightly above the average, suggesting healthy markup or cost control at the sales level. However, net margin is negative, while peers are moderately profitable; this may be due to high operating costs, increased bad debt expense, or FX fluctuations.
-
Liquidity: Your current and quick ratios are much higher than industry norms, indicating strong short-term solvency (perhaps excess cash or a conservative approach to liabilities).
-
Working Capital: Accounts receivable is a little slow (higher days than peers), and inventory turnover is lower than median—implying more cash is tied up in inventory and receivables than typical. This can reduce efficiency and present risks if not managed.
-
Leverage: Your company is less leveraged than industry peers—a risk-averse profile, but may miss benefits of low-cost capital.
-
Areas for review: Operating expenses (SG&A), accounts receivable policy, and inventory management should be reviewed to improve profitability and cash flow efficiency, especially given the net loss year-to-date.